The $100 Example: Protecting Down Markets
Why Protecting in Down Markets is More Important Than Participating in Up Ones

In my last piece I wrote in May, “Sandpiles & Bridging Market Uncertainty,” I stated that to understand the law of compounding money is to understand that the degree to which you protect capital loss in down markets is much more important than the degree to which you grow capital in up markets.  In this piece, I will get into that in a little more detail using real life examples.

Before we get into it though, it’s important to clarify my statement and the title of this piece. We are not saying that participating in up markets is not important – it absolutely is.  What we are saying is that in order to compound money at a steady rate over time, an investor does not need to capture all of the upside of the market in good periods if he is protecting himself from considerable downside in bad periods.  Some of the smartest financially savvy folks I know overlook this. Let me give you an example to highlight my point. Take a look at Investment A and Investment B below.  Which investment made more money at the end of the two year period?

Return in Year 1

Return in Year 2

Investment A

-11%

20%

Investment B

-38%

60%

If you said Investment A, you’re right. If you chose B, then you need to understand the following explanation carefully. We are going to assume that each of these investments was made with an initial of investment of $100 in this example.

Beginning Investment

Return in Year 1 (%)

Value of Investment at End of Year 1

Return in Year 2 (%)

Value of Investment at End of Year 2

Total Return over 2 Years (%)

Investment A

$100

-11%

$89

20%

$107

7%

Investment B

$100

-38%

$62

60%

$99

-1%

S&P 500

$100

-37%

$63

28%

$81

-19%

Yes, Investment B had a huge return in Year 2 of 60%, but that 60% return was on $62, because of the destructive loss it sustained in Year 1.  However, that 60%, as you can see above, does not even get this investment back to break even over the 2 Year Period!   In contrast, Investment A returned just 1/3 of what Investment B returned (only 20%) in Year 2, but because it only lost 11% in Year 1, it returned a positive 7% over the 2 year period and outperformed Investment B by a total of 8%! The key here is the downside protection.  

For example, Think of negative returns like digging yourself a hole.   The more negative the return, the deeper the hole you dig for yourself and the harder it is to get out. Another way to say this is that the more negative the return, the higher the return must be to get back to break even and continue growing your investment again. A negative 10% return requires just an 11% return to get back to even, a negative 20% return requires a 25% return to get back to even, but a negative 40% return requires a 67% return to get back to even, while a negative 50% return requires a 100% return to get out of the hole!

Investment A represents that of a prudent investor.  He uses flat to up markets (i.e. Year 2) to grow his portfolio.  His portfolio during these periods will often not capture all of the upside of the market.  Nevertheless, he outperforms his peers over a full market cycle (i.e. a bull market and a bear market), because he protects capital so well in down markets (i.e. Year 1).   This is the type of investing we favor at Beacon Pointe.   Not only does it grow capital over full market cycles, but it does so in a way that minimizes risk (and anxiety!) while allowing clients to meet their investment goals.   Most investment strategies can make money when the market is going up – that’s easy.   The few great strategies, however, are those that avoid giving most of it back in down periods.

As the well known Warren Buffett says, “You don’t know who’s swimming naked until the tide goes out.”

~Graham Pierce, Managing Director – Private Client Group

Important Disclosure: This content is for informational purposes only. Opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Beacon Pointe has exercised all reasonable professional care in preparing this information. Some information may have been obtained from third-party sources we believe to be reliable; however, Beacon Pointe has not independently verified, or attested to, the accuracy or authenticity of the information. Nothing contained herein should be construed or relied upon as investment, legal or tax advice. Only private legal counsel may recommend the application of this general information to any particular situation or prepare an instrument chosen to implement the design discussed herein. An investor should consult with their financial professional before making any investment decisions.

Copyright © 2024 Beacon Pointe Advisors, LLC®. No part of this document may be reproduced.   

IMPORTANT NOTICE:

You are now leaving the website of Beacon Pointe Advisors and will be entering the website for Institutional Intelligent Portfolios®, an automated investment management service made available to you exclusively through Beacon Pointe Advisors. Beacon Pointe Advisors is independent of and not owned by, affiliated with, or sponsored or supervised by Schwab. Schwab has no responsibility for the content of Beacon Pointe Advisors' website. This link to the Institutional Intelligent Portfolios website should not be considered to be either a recommendation by SPT, Schwab, or any of their affiliates, or a solicitation of any offer to purchase or sell any security.

Privacy Preferences
When you visit our website, it may store information through your browser from specific services, usually in form of cookies. Here you can change your privacy preferences. Please note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our website and the services we offer.
Loading...